Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 77.8 against 75.8. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has the previous 4.4.2 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Galaxy S5 Sport construction is a little lighter than the Moto Z Force, but it's somewhat thicker and was released 2 years before.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 48 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a little bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, and they both have 4 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Moto Z Force captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto Z Force also has a bigger aperture and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Moto Z Force features improved battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.