Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 80.1 against 75.8. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is noticeably newer than the Moto Z Force's, although it is notably heavier and notably thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version, giving some extra features.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher number of faster cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a bit higher pixel count per inch of screen.
The Moto Z Force captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a much better (4K) video quality. The Moto Z Force has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.