Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than Moto Z Force, with an 85.6 score against 75.8. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is newer and just a little thinner, but also heavier than Moto Z Force.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory. Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola Moto Z Force takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a camera with much more mega-pixels. Moto Z Force counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto Z Force, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.