Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 250.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a heavier phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but both of them have the same thickness. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
Moto Z Force has more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a back-facing camera with much less MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, they both have the same aperture.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.