Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a way newer and just a bit thinner device than the Moto Z Force, although it's noticeably heavier.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a higher pixel density. Motorola Moto Z Force has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has more processing cores and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, they both have the same aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.