Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Moto Z Force, having a overall score of 90.6 against 75.8. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is notably newer and thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Moto Z Force. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Moto Z Force features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 26% larger battery size.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.