Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and Grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia 5 II is better than Moto Z Force, getting a global score of 87.2 against 75.8. Sony Xperia 5 II is a just a little thicker cellphone than the Moto Z Force, but both have the same weight. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better display than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Xperia 5 II features a slightly better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xperia 5 II counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Xperia 5 II captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations. Xperia 5 II features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Xperia 5 II is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. If you want to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.