Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO has a score of 94.3, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Xperia PRO's body is much newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it is noticeably thicker and way heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Xperia PRO has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Xperia PRO counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a bigger screen, a better resolution of 1644 x 3840px and a just a little greater screen pixels density. The Xperia PRO features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto Z Force, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Sony Xperia PRO features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Sony Xperia PRO has a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Xperia PRO counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower video quality and a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xperia PRO, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.