Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has an overall score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Xperia XZ2 Premium is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z Force, but it is a lot thicker and extremely heavier. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cores.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium features a much more vibrant display than Moto Z Force, because it has a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels, more pixels per inch of display and a quite larger screen. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a less megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xperia XZ2 Premium has a little better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 3540mAh of battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Force, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.