Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has a score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. These devices come with Android operating system, but Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Xperia Z4v body is a bit lighter than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's thicker and was released just a little over a year before.
The Xperia Z4v features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and an extra graphics co-processor. The Sony Xperia Z4v features a much better display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a bit greater display pixel density.
The Xperia Z4v features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Motorola Moto Z Force features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force has a bit better battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
The Sony Xperia Z4v not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.