Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
TCL 20 Pro 5G is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 76.1 against 75.8. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but the TCL 20 Pro 5G has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. TCL 20 Pro 5G's design is extremely newer than the Moto Z Force's, but it's somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Moto Z Force counts with a little more vivid display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The TCL 20 Pro 5G captures better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a back camera with a much better resolution.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.