Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, getting an 81.4 score against 75.8. Although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a bit thicker than Moto Z Force, it's a bit lighter and also notably newer. These phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Motorola Moto Z Force has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster). Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Moto Z Force has a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.