Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with an 82.7 score against 75.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an older 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is extremely newer than the Moto Z Force, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. The Moto Z Force features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a back facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution and faster video frame rate. The Moto Z Force counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.