Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A3 is slightly better than Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 79.2 against 75.8. Xiaomi Mi A3's design is newer than the Moto Z Force's, but it's thicker and a little heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi A3 has the older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Moto Z Force counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher display pixel density and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Xiaomi Mi A3 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has 4 more CPU cores.
Moto Z Force features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi A3 takes better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 has just a little better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 15 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.