Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is better than the Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's body is newer than the Moto Z Force's, but it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Moto Z Force features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit faster processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto Z Force features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z Force also has a way more megapixels camera.
Moto Z Force features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z Force, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.