Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the Moto Z Force, having a score of 87.9 against 75.8. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is incredibly newer than Moto Z Force's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a lot worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display. Motorola Moto Z Force has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more processing cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a camera in the back with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a really longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.