Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a general score of 87.3, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F3 is noticeably newer than Moto Z Force, it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F3 has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a way worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has greater battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. Xiaomi Poco F3 takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.