Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has an overall score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Although Xiaomi Poco M3 is way newer than the Moto Z Force, it's somewhat heavier and much thicker. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco M3 has the older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a greater number of cores (although slower). Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density.
The Moto Z Force counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 71 percent more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.