Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Although the Xiaomi Poco X2 is way newer than Moto Z Force, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X2 has older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Moto Z Force counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more 2.2 GHz cpu cores. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.