Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a global score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a noticeably newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, but it is noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the previous 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more cores. The Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.