Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a general score of 91.5, which is a lot better than the Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer construction is incredibly newer than Moto Z Force's, although it's a lot heavier and thicker. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has older 12 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much lower pixels quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen. Moto Z Force has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a bit faster processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.