Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a 76.6 score against 75.8. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is extremely newer than the Moto Z Force, it is somewhat heavier and thicker.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit better processor than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores (but slower). Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a way more MP camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a better device, it costs a little more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, else you can save some money and buy the Moto Z Force, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.