Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is way newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto Z Force features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more MP back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs more money than the Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.