Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the Moto Z Force, with a 79 score against 75.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is extremely newer than Moto Z Force, it is much heavier and somewhat thicker.
Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Moto Z Force counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rates and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.