Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2016-09-08 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has an overall score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 global score. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it is also just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. The HTC U11 has a little faster processor than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cores, the HTC U11 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The HTC U11 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a same size display, the HTC U11 also has a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The HTC U11 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a back facing camera with much less megapixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Motorola Moto Z Play Droid has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Play Droid features just a little bit longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.