Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2016-09-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than Moto Z Play Droid, having an 81.3 score against 71.8. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is newer and a little lighter, but also a little bit thicker than Moto Z Play Droid. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a greater pixels density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z Play Droid counts with a bit longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3510mAh battery size. LG V35 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution camera in the back, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.