Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is way better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, getting a general score of 87.1 against 71.8. LG Velvet's construction is newer than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's, but it's a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. The LG Velvet has a bit superior CPU than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet has a little sharper screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG Velvet has superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3510mAh. LG Velvet captures better pictures and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also has a much more megapixels back camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.