Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 is much better than Moto Z Play Droid, with an 81.3 score against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a incredibly newer phone than Moto Z Play Droid, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Galaxy A31 has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a larger display, a bit better number of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Moto Z Play Droid has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A31, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Play Droid and Samsung Galaxy A31 both count with very similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy A31 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A31 has a better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A31 also has a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy A31 features a very superior battery duration than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.