Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, getting an 86.6 score against 71.8. The Galaxy A50s body is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's, although it's just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy A50s features a little bit better display than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display.
Galaxy A50s has a better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50s features a little bit better performance than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A50s also has 3 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a little better battery life than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same video quality, a F2 camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.