Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than the Moto Z Play Droid, with a global score of 91.3 against 71.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much newer than the Moto Z Play Droid, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a bigger display, a just a bit better screen density and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way better camera than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger aperture and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.