Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with a score of 92.9 against 71.8. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot newer than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, it is heavier and thicker. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster processor than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.