Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is better than the Moto Z Play Droid's global score of 71.8. Galaxy F41 is a incredibly newer phone than the Moto Z Play Droid, but it's thicker and heavier. Galaxy F41 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a little bit better pixel count per inch in the screen, a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Moto Z Play Droid counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy F41 has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F41 also has a back camera with a way better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy F41 has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.