Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with a 97.6 score against 71.8. The Galaxy Fold is a way newer and a bit thinner device than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, but it's also much heavier. The Motorola Moto Z Play Droid and the Galaxy Fold feature really similar screens, because although the Galaxy Fold has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a much bigger display.
The Galaxy Fold has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold has a slightly better camera than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a worse video resolution and a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.