Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is a bit better than Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 score. Samsung Galaxy M20's body is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Moto Z Play Droid. The Moto Z Play Droid has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Moto Z Play Droid and the Galaxy M20 have incredibly similar screens, although the Galaxy M20 also has a little bit better number of pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit larger display. The Moto Z Play Droid features slightly more memory for applications and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features a really longer battery duration than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh. Moto Z Play Droid captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.