Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Moto Z Play Droid, getting a score of 90.8 against 71.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is newer than the Moto Z Play Droid, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better looking display than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Play Droid counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features a better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.