Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is a lot better than the Moto Z Play Droid, with an 86.2 score against 71.8. Even though the Galaxy Note10 Lite is extremely newer than Moto Z Play Droid, it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3510mAh. The Galaxy Note10 Lite takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a lot worse resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.