Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than Moto Z Play Droid, having an 86.3 score against 71.8. Galaxy S10e's design is newer and a bit lighter than Moto Z Play Droid's, but it is just a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better CPU than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a little larger display, a bit more pixels per display inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 resolution. The Galaxy S10e features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto Z Play Droid counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh. The Galaxy S10e captures a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.