Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Moto Z Play Droid, having a 98 score against 71.8. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is a lot newer than the Moto Z Play Droid's, but it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3510mAh. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better videos and photos than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.