Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-08 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot better than the Moto Z Play Droid, with a overall score of 90.7 against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra design is noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner than the Moto Z Play Droid. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a just a little greater pixels density.
The Moto Z Play Droid features a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better photos in low light situations, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with way more MP. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 42% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.