Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue and Red |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with a 77.8 score against 71.8. Galaxy S5 Sport is an extremely older and thicker phone than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, but Samsung made it just a little bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has lesser RAM memory and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a brighter screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a little greater number of pixels per screen inch. Moto Z Play Droid has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution. The Moto Z Play Droid has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3510mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.