Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with an 80.1 score against 71.8. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a much newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, but it is noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better screen than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z Play Droid counts with a little bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Moto Z Play Droid takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.