Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Moto Z Play Droid, getting a score of 81 against 71.8. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is incredibly newer than Moto Z Play Droid, it is extremely thicker and incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a just a little higher pixel amount in each inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Galaxy XCover Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Moto Z Play Droid has a little bit better memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has greater battery lifetime than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.