Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than Moto Z Play Droid's overall score of 71.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a a bit heavier phone than the Moto Z Play Droid, but both of them have the same thickness. Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a quite greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Moto Z Play Droid counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3510mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.