Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has an overall score of 83.3, which is better than the Moto Z's score of 74.5. The iPhone 11 body is noticeably newer than the Moto Z's, but it's incredibly heavier and incredibly thicker. IPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x OS, and Moto Z counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. The iPhone 11 counts with a greater hardware performance than Moto Z, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 also has 2 more cores and a 64-bits processor.
Moto Z features a little more vivid display than iPhone 11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel amount per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Apple iPhone 11 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto Z features a superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone 11 has greater battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 3110mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto Z, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.