Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a general score of 85.3, which is much better than Moto Z's 74.5 global score. The iPhone 11 Pro Max design is newer than the Moto Z's, although it's notably heavier and extremely thicker. IPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a better processing power than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a 64-bit processing unit and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a bit worse pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display.
The Moto Z features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone 11 Pro Max captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z, although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video definition, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a very superior battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 53% bigger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.