Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is way better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 score. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a notably newer phone than Motorola Moto Z, but it is notably thicker and notably heavier. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Motorola Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a better processing power than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a greater number of faster cores, a 64-bits processor and more RAM. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a little sharper screen than Moto Z, because although it has a bit inferior pixels count per screen inch and a bit lower 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a back camera with less megapixels resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video. Motorola Moto Z has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a really longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto Z, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.