Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is way better than the Moto Z's score of 74.5. The iPhone 13 Pro is a way newer phone than the Moto Z, although it is much thicker and extremely heavier. IPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a bit sharper display than Moto Z, because although it has a little bit worse pixel count in each display inch and a bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532px, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. IPhone 13 Pro features a superior processing power than Moto Z, because it has a 64-bit processing unit, 2 GB more RAM and more cores.
IPhone 13 Pro captures a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. Moto Z has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 3095mAh battery size.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro costs a lot more than Moto Z, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.