Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than Moto Z's 74.5 general score. IPhone 13 Pro Max is a extremely newer phone than Moto Z, although it's noticeably heavier and extremely thicker. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a little sharper screen than Moto Z, because although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per screen inch and a bit lower 1284 x 2778 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a superior performance than Moto Z, because it has a higher number of cores, a 64 bits CPU and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments. The Motorola Moto Z has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 4352mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.