Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 92.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3279mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 is much better than the Moto Z, with a score of 92.5 against 74.5. IPhone 14 comes with iOS 16.x OS, and Moto Z works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Although the iPhone 14 is newer than Moto Z, it's extremely heavier and extremely thicker. Apple iPhone 14 has a more powerful processing unit than Moto Z, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory, more processing cores and a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone 14 features a bit more vivid display than Moto Z, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a little lower resolution of 1170 x 2532, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Moto Z has a much better storage for games and applications than iPhone 14, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 14 features better battery performance than Moto Z, because it has 3279mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh. The iPhone 14 takes a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images.
IPhone 14 is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.