Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a global score of 95.6, which is much better than Moto Z's 74.5 global score. Apple iPhone 14 Pro's construction is incredibly newer, but incredibly thicker and a lot heavier than Moto Z. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x operating system, and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The iPhone 14 Pro has a very superior hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has a 64-bits processor, a larger amount of RAM memory and 2 more cpu cores. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a brighter display than Moto Z, because although it has a just a little lower pixel count in each inch in the display and a little bit lower resolution of 1179 x 2556, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with a way higher resolution. The Motorola Moto Z features a very superior memory for apps and games than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone 14 Pro features greater battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 23% greater battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro is way more expensive than the Moto Z, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.